WDEV special: Subscribe now and get 4 weeks free >>> here
deutschsprachige Version

Our new website address:  
www.wdev.eu  

Home Mission Statement Subscriptions Sample Copies Services Blogs Background Links Archives

Volume 2017
Volume 2016
Volume 2015
Volume 2014
Volume 2013
Volume 2012
Volume 2011
Volume 2010
Volume 2009
Volume 2008
Volume 2007
Volume 2006
In-depth:
Special Reports
LOGIN
For subscribers only
Show memo
Show shopping cart
Proceed to check-out
Your account
Europe Global Environment & Development The New South From G8 to G20 The Development Agenda UN Reform Global Finance Doha Final The Euro-zone in Crisis Eastern Europe


The Development Friends Declaration

and a communication of Latin American countries

The 8th Ministerial of the World Trade Organisation saw more than 100 developing and least developed countries (LDCs) come out with strong statement that reiterated their commitment to the Doha Development Agenda based on its core principles of “the development mandate, single undertaking, decision based on multilateral consensus and progress made and a bottom up approach that is inclusive and transparent”. A TWN Info Service report with the full text of the declaration

 

The group in a ministerial declaration entitled ‘Friends of Development’ highlighted the need for following due process for ensuring “inclusiveness, transparency and multilateral consensus based decision making” (para 7). The declaration was supported by Ministers of the African Union, the African Caribbean Pacific Group, the LDCs, the Small and Vulnerable Economies, Argentina, Brazil, China, Ecuador, India, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela.

The group, in §2 of the declaration, said that “we are willing to look at different approaches that are constructive to resolving the impasse. However, we do not support the adoption of a plurilateral approach to concluding the Round or parts of it, because it goes against the principles of multilateralism and inclusiveness.”

The LDC package was another of the thrust areas and the declaration asked that in their efforts to reach provisional or definitive agreements based on consensus, members must give first priority to issues of interest for LDCs. The full implementation of Decision 36 of Annex F of the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration, Cotton, Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT), monitoring mechanism, implementation issues and several concerns related to agriculture. The Group also emphasised the role of the Trade and Development Committee and asked that it be strengthened so that it can conduct a review of the S&D provisions in the WTO agreements from a development perspective.

An issue that has come up in the Ministerial is the ‘rise of protectionism’ in the wake of the economic crisis, with some members asking for limits to be imposed even on the use of currently available instruments of protection such as raising applied tariffs to the bound rate which is allowed by the WTO. The declaration made a commitment to resist the rise of protectionism in all forms but only on the condition that “there is full recognition of a Member’s ability to use WTO consistent measures to achieve its legitimate objectives of growth, development and stability” (Para 8). This clearly reiterates the rights of developing countries to protect themselves in WTO-consistent ways.


Full text of the Ministerial Declaration "Friends of Development"

We, the Ministers of the African Union, the African Caribbean Pacific Group, the Least Developed Countries, the Small Vulnerable Economies, Argentina, Brazil, China, Ecuador, India, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela met on 15 December 2011 in Geneva before the 8th World Trade Organisation (WTO) Ministerial Conference, to review the current status of developments relating to multilateral trade.

We remain fully committed to concluding the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) negotiations. We believe that without the completion of the Doha Round, the credibility of the WTO would suffer a damaging blow and it would seriously circumscribe the WTO's future endeavours.

The Doha Round needs to be concluded, bearing fully in mind the membership's commitment to the core principles of the DDA, viz. the development mandate, single undertaking, decision making based on multilateral consensus and progress made and a bottom up approach that is inclusive and transparent.

We are disappointed at the impasse in the Doha Round. We are willing to look at different approaches that are constructive to resolving the impasse. However, we do not support the adoption of a plurilateral approach to concluding the Round or parts of it, because it goes against the principles of multilateralism and inclusiveness. Therefore, any fresh approach has to be a multilateral consensus based one, firmly anchored within the Doha Mandate.

We also acknowledge that Members should try to explore making progress on elements of the Doha Declaration that allow them to reach provisional or definitive agreements based on consensus, but the first priority must be given to issues of interest to the least developed countries (LDCs), such as the full implementation of Decision 36 of Annex F of the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration, Cotton, Agreement Specific Proposals and other development issues like Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT) in different areas, the Monitoring Mechanism, Implementation Related Issues and concerns and Agriculture.

Development has to remain at the centre of any approach not only for an early harvest programme but across all areas of the Doha Round negotiations and other WTO work. In this context, we reaffirm the need to strengthen the functioning of the Committee on Trade and Development (CTD) so as to enable it to conduct a Development Review of all S&D provisions in the WTO Agreements.

We recognise that the WTO provides a forum for discussion of trade related matters. Any trade related issue should be discussed in the appropriate body constituted under the WTO, provided it follows due process and is guided by the principles of inclusiveness, transparency and multilateral consensus based decision making.

We firmly stand against the rise of protectionism and remain committed to resist it in all forms, provided there is full recognition of a Member's ability to use WTO consistent measures to achieve its legitimate objectives of growth, development and stability.

We welcome the accession of Vanuatu, Samoa, Montenegro and the Russian Federation to the WTO. We also welcome the decision to evolve benchmarks for the accession of Least Developed Countries and urge Members to fully commit themselves to the letter and spirit of the decision in order to make the WTO a more representative and universal organization.

Geneva, 15 December 2011



Ministers from the various countries and blocs who spoke echoed the sentiment expressed in the declaration. The Chair urged members to not look at the current Ministerial as ‘business as usual” as circumstances in the global economy were very severe. The Brazilian Ambassador supported the statement. South African Minister of Trade, Rob Davies, said that the adoption of this Declaration shows that the vast majority of WTO members (more than 100 countries) have stated that the way forward is to remain focused on the development mandate and seek a development outcome and retain the policy space that they have fought for, consistent with WTO rules. Minister Davies said the 100+ countries were calling on the rest of the WTO membership to take very seriously what they were saying. The Minister concluded that “We are not the blockage, we are the life force and the way forward …. Someone else is the blockage and the cause of the impasse we are facing today”.

China said that the interests of developing countries needed to be safeguarded and continuous efforts were needed to realise the development dimension of the Doha Round. India’s Minister of Commerce and Industry reflected the feelings expressed by his fellow speakers. He said it is imperative that they reaffirm with clarity to take the DDA and its core principles forward. While the group recognises the various approaches to new issues, he stressed that multilateralism is the only way which is balanced and also addresses the historical distortions. This round has taken so much of human, physical, financial resources, and so much work has gone into making it a successful development round, that the centrality of the development dimension cannot be undermined and that is the only way forward.

Bangadesh on behalf of the LDC Group also echoed that sentiment and said that development must be at the core of the DDA. The ACP Coordinator said that the “friends of development group” is not only a powerful group in terms of numerical strength, it is also a group that has a powerful voice supporting development. Egypt commended the statement and said it should be put into action by all. It said that after 10 years of negotiations, years that have seen different types of crisis, there is the need to give clear indications that without a sustainable, development outcome the world will still be worse off. This message is important to send out as otherwise the issues of development, jobs and participation will be eroding.

In a separate Communication, Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Venezuela noted that “increasingly sophisticated methods are used to prevent the participation of all Members and to give the appearance of an inclusive and consensual process.” Referring to the Political Guidance document the statement pointed out that ‘just a day before the formal meeting of the General Council of 30 November 2011, the unchangeable results of a consultation process conducted in small groups were presented; unchangeable because, according to those responsible, they reflected a delicate balance and could therefore only be made available for other Members' information” (§2).

The Communication stated that ‘In practice, the WTO has become an organization that is not led by its Members, in which decision-making based on facts is not governed by consensus, and negotiating meetings are not open to participation by all Members.’

The Communication made it clear ‘that all work at the Eighth Ministerial Conference and from 2012 onwards must be open to the participation of all Members, and it cannot be assumed, in any circumstances, that one or more Members represent others. Moreover, any document resulting from consultations conducted in small groups should be considered as another contribution, subject to amendment by any of the Members.’

The Communication criticises the report by the Chairman of the General Council (Elements for Political Guidance) as containing ‘elements that intentionally underline the fundamental principles of the Doha Ministerial Declaration; it deliberately fails to identify the causes of the impasse in the Round, and fails to point out the lack of political will to overcome them.’ After listing specific concerns on the Elements of Political Guidance, the Communication concluded that ‘We reaffirm the crucial importance of the development dimension in all WTO work and the importance of continuing the Doha Development Round. . . To this end, it is essential to preserve multilateralism and the single undertaking, without the inclusion of new topics, plurilateral initiatives or reinterpretations of the mandate of the “Doha Development Agenda”’.

The countries making this Communication then stated that these Elements for Political Guidance represent only the opinion of some Members and they therefore disassociated themselves from the consensus. They declared that they consider the Elements for Political Guidance document to be void of any legally binding effect on WTO Members, since it has been presented under the sole responsibility of the Chairman of the General Council.


More on this topic:

>>> The New South

* SUBSCRIBE to World Economy & Development in brief >>> here.










Prognosis 2012: On the brink of a global recession / EuroMemo: European integration at the crossroads

print

Top of page

Imprint General Terms and Conditions RSS Feeds Site Map